If an
organization is to be a learning organization it must engage in critical
self-inquiry at all levels. Given the imperatives of the post-modern,
information age, a process for engaging in rational communicative inquiry is
essential. Technology is driving this imperative and can promote its successful
outcome. The much greater capability to share, store, present, and retrieve
information presents us with the challenge of organizing a process of
continuous improvement that can harness this data processing power to create
knowledge to improve student performance.
To do this at
the organizational level requires coordination of technological resources,
development of a shared information system, and cultivation of human resources
so that educators can become knowledge workers. That is our challenge as
advocates of education. The feedback can play an important role in conquering
this challenge by preventing us from simply going around in circles.
|
As the use of
technology continues to improve and becomes more accessible for students and
teachers, I believe and hope that schools will be transformed from isolated
classrooms into vibrant learning communities. If technology can promote this,
then surely technology matters.
As I have
observed, I have a clearer picture of how students learn electronic information
access skills and how I can improve my instruction using the technology.
The challenges
are great; the possibilities are limitless. We have come to live the experience
of how the Chinese people define crisis. The Chinese character means “opportunity”
and crisis. It suggests that we are in a time of both opportunity and crisis.
The crisis we
are facing is the crisis to public education as we struggle to maintain a
system designed to educate our democratic nation. In conjuction with the advent
of technology, we are observing a larger number of students, a greater
inclusion of special needs students, more research and information about
teaching and learning around which to process and shape practices, and a
potential system based on accountability information systems.
The opportunity
is that we are finally able to do what we believe all educators have wanted to
do for so many years – create a science for teaching that does not ignore the
art of teaching. We can finally bring all of the incredibly rich and artistic
experiences teachers have developed to the fore, and so bring the wisdom of
teaching to the larger education community. We can communicate with one another
and connect to one another in ways that were either costly of our time and
finances as possible. To meet the challenges posed by technology with the aim
of improving student performance, we will need to follow a path of continuous
growth and learning.
|
In order for the
implementation of technology to be successful and effective, schools must be
careful about external management or leadership. Yes, we sometimes need the
help of experts from outside our immediate school environment, but often those
experts are not familiar with the special needs of our school, therefore
offering advice and council not particularly helpful to our needs. Some would
say that in this case, the leader is really neglecting his or her
responsibility to manage technology in such a way as to meet institutional
goals and objectives.
One might
reasonably ask, how can a person be the technology leader if he or she is not
technologically competent or knowledgeable? I am not suggesting that leaders
must avoid the use of technological experts from outside the school
environment. The value of outside expertise and experience is not in question
here. The core is this” A person as the technology leader must remain visible
and involved in guiding the process of implementing technology, with teaching
and learning as the driving force.
|
Identifying what
direction we want ahead should be based on our organization’s needs and desires
and focused on using our available resources – both financial and human:
determining why we should head in that direction should be based on sound
educational research; and determining how we will know when we get there
requires the establishment of measurable goals and a continuous evaluation
plan.
The leader
should strive to integrate the technology plan into the school culture as much
as possible. If technology is appropriately implemented, it is woven into the
fabric of the school community and exists in harmony with all other aspects of
the organization. Technology plans too separate distant from institutional
goals and objectives make it difficult to identify the connection between
technology and the teaching and learning goals it is designed to support.
|